Blog on The Da Vinci Code

        

    The Da Vinci Code is the novel written by Dan Brown and this is the detective novel and novel written around the investigation of the family of Jesus. The Da Vinci Code is divided into 105 chapters with a Prologue and an Epilogue. The structure of the book is such that, just about every time there is a scene change or the point of view changes, a new chapter begins.The Da Vinci Code is written as a classic thriller in which, throughout the book, good and evil take turns having the upper hand. However, by the end of the book, the age-old truth is proven again, that good triumphs over evil. In this book, evil was more accurately described as greed.

1)   Brown states on his website that his books are not anti-Christian, though he is on a 'constant spiritual journey' himself, and says that his book The Da Vinci Code is simply "an entertaining story that promotes spiritual discussion and debate" and suggests that the book may be used "as a positive catalyst for introspection and exploration of our faith."

A Hope with connection with religion. Identifying what is knowledge. And identifying & acknowledge the relationship of the “Knower” and the “Known”, and last What is the procedure of “knowing”? in the novel doubting the Christian  religion. The character like Silas and Bezu Fache is like all mirror image and movie is not atheist. Believer of divine is present here. He don’t neglect god, but at the end even protagonist looks more religious . Phobia is no more because touching the hands of sophie, this presented magical Blood power such type intuited of power of Blood and  Science and religion both are conflicts and never divinity of God.

2) “Although it is obvious that much of what Brown presented in his novel as absolutely true and accurate is neither of those, some of that material is of course essential to the intrigue, and screenwriter Akiva Goldsman has retained the novel's core, the Grail-related material: the sacred feminine, Mary Magdalene's marriage, the Priory of Sion, certain aspects of Leonardo's art, and so on[1].” How far do you agree with this observation of Norris J. Lacy?

“History is always written by the winners. When two cultures clash, the loser is obliterated, and the winner writes the history books-books which glorify their own cause and disparage the conquered foe. As Napoleon once said, 'What is history, but a fable agreed upon?” 

It’s historically way of  looking, in the novel power character of sketch of portray. The narrative of the novel is hanging and suspense and hanging the audience with this episode in movie like Murder’s mystery, Silas Murders and this all are connected each other.  And other country study of religion and critically study. it is just  a fable, verity of ground film is deconstructed, history is constrstucted whatever has writing  form we can see.

 3) You have studied ‘Genesis’ (The Bible), ‘The Paradise Lost’ (John Milton) and ‘The Da Vinci Code’ (Dan Brown). Which of the narrative/s seem/s to be truthful? Whose narrative is convincing to the contemporary young mind?

Yes we all are  studied ‘Genesis’ (The Bible), ‘The ParadiseLost’ (John Milton) and ‘The Da Vinci Code’ (Dan Brown).  But first fall here I will say that how narration, how say story but most important part that is “ How” is told is more important. In this all are presented the history of Christianity. Here we can talk the book of Johan Milton’s Paradise Lost long narrative, establish the role of man and woman, Raphel’s  character told that intellectual .   In The Bible talk about the roll of division of male and female, What’s the roll of Adam and Eve no nagotiation of character of Bible. In Bible Underprevillege female and previllage male presented. Ex. like Death and Suffering for illness because of woman, hatred the humanity. And the last We can discuss on ‘The Da Vinci Code’ (Dan Brown) uses point of view brilliantly in The Da Vinci Code to increase suspense and keep the reader guessing what will happen next. Brown increases suspense by using third person point of view that is for the most part, not omniscient. So, the reader sees and knows only what the characters in that particular scene are experiencing and thinking. For example, the identity of the Teacher is hinted at by the author but not revealed until Robert and Sophie discover his true identity. Also, regarding the reasons for Sauniere's murder, the reader learns along with the main characters rather than knowing in the beginning and then just observing the characters finding their way.